Advice | Miss Manners: I thought Americans shouldn’t curtsy to foreign royalty?

Spread the love


Expensive Miss Manners: In a TV present about Prince Harry and his spouse, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, they described the primary time Meghan met the queen. This was after they have been nonetheless courting, so she didn’t have any royal titles. She was an American citizen, not British royalty.

I heard that Harry informed Meghan on the final minute, within the automotive on the way in which to the assembly, that she was going to should curtsy to the queen. The one factor that Meghan apparently questioned was whether or not she knew how, and whether or not she would do it properly sufficient.

However I used to be at all times taught, at the same time as a toddler, that after the American Revolution, Individuals didn’t curtsy to international royalty. Am I incorrect? Was Meghan required to curtsy to the monarch of one other nation, simply because she was courting the monarch’s grandson?

Does it should do with what place one holds in the USA? As an example, if the president and his spouse go to the queen (or now the king), is the primary girl anticipated to curtsy? Or is it merely that Americans don’t curtsy to royalty, however as a substitute present respect in different methods? In that case, what are they?

What ought to Meghan actually have been anticipated to do?

You might be fairly proper that Americans — and particularly American officers — mustn’t present obeisance to international potentates, which is what a curtsy (or bow) symbolizes. Nor do British diplomats present this to anybody besides their very own monarch.

Not creating offense is one other diplomatic goal, and never just for skilled diplomats.

Miss Manners can think about that this issue would prevail with somebody who’s about to satisfy her future grandmother-in-law and whose future husband has knowledgeable her of that particular person’s expectations.

Expensive Miss Manners: My boss and I’ve the identical diploma in our discipline, which we every acquired at roughly the identical time. When he writes out his title — in his electronic mail signature, for instance, and in his biography on the group’s web site — he contains each the honorific related to the diploma earlier than his title and the letters after it (e.g., Dr. John Smith, PhD).

After I acquired my diploma, I used to be taught that it was incorrect to do that in writing — that one may embody the honorific (Dr. John Smith) or the letters (John Smith, PhD), however not each.

Possibly that is trivial, however we work in a setting the place type, grammar and custom are of key significance. My first query is: Am I right in my understanding? And second: In that case, might I counsel that he treatment this little error?

New Miss Manners columns are posted Monday by means of Saturday on You may ship inquiries to Miss Manners at her web site, You may also comply with her @RealMissManners.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *