Criticism of book on Trump prosecution “unfounded,” says Pomerantz

Spread the love

The previous chief of the Manhattan district lawyer’s investigation of Donald Trump rejected criticism that particulars spilled in his new tell-all e-book will hurt any case introduced towards the previous president.

“I believe the criticism is unfounded,” Mark Pomerantz informed Chuck Todd on “Meet the Press,” and predicted his e-book could be “meaningless” to any prosecution.

Pomerantz’s e-book, “People vs. Donald Trump,” describes his work investigating Trump’s alleged monetary crimes as a particular prosecutor within the Manhattan D.A.’s workplace. Pomerantz, a former federal prosecutor, was employed by former D.A. Cy Vance Jr. to helm the investigation of Trump’s funds. The staff efficiently indicted the Trump Group for fraud, however Pomerantz give up a month into the tenure of latest Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg when Bragg himself declined to green-light a case towards Trump.

Todd famous that many former prosecutors, together with Andrew Weissmann, a member of particular counsel Robert Mueller’s staff and an MSNBC contributor, and former U.S. lawyer Barbara McQuade, have mentioned publicly that the revelations in Pomerantz’s e-book may hamper makes an attempt to prosecute Trump, and be weaponized by Trump’s protection attorneys in a trial.

Challenges for mounting a jury trial “circulate from the ocean of ink spilled about Donald Trump and his lies and what I consider are his crimes,” Pomerantz responded. “I don’t suppose my e-book will make the slightest distinction if there’s a jury trial.”

Pomerantz mentioned Trump’s protection attorneys would probably make objections about “the whole lot beneath the solar” and predicted that the district lawyer’s workplace will inform the courtroom, “‘There may be nothing on this e-book that ought to prejudice this prosecution. So the e-book is meaningless, it doesn’t present any sort of protection.’”

The Manhattan D.A.’s workplace now appears to be shifting ahead on a possible prosecution of Trump for the alleged hush cash funds to porn star Stormy Daniels. Pomerantz famous that something in his e-book about that case was already within the public area “for actually years,” through the media, former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen’s e-book and the federal case towards Cohen for the funds.

“I’m as positive as I may be that this isn’t going to compromise the prosecution,” mentioned Pomerantz.

Pressed by Todd, Pomerantz additionally insisted that Vance had green-lit a prosecution of Trump earlier than leaving workplace on the finish of 2021. Requested why no fees had been filed, Pomerantz mentioned the case was not prepared: “We couldn’t get it finished.”

Bragg, who took workplace in January 2022, has mentioned he and different prosecutors reviewed the case and decided it was not prepared.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *